Peter Makachia, a concerned citizen and anti-corruption activist, filed the petition, accusing KURA leadership of violating governance and accountability principles.
The case will be heard urgently on July 3, 2025, at the Milimani High Court.
Petitioner raises concerns over road projects
In court documents filed on June 18, 2025, Makachia alleges that KURA paid contractors more than Sh687 million for projects that remain incomplete or stalled.
He claims several road projects under Eng. Kinoti’s leadership have experienced delays despite payments to contractors.
The petitioner has mentioned companies, including Cementers Construction Company, in relation to the alleged irregular payments.
Auditor-General report cited in petition
Makachia has relied on findings from the Auditor-General’s report for the 2021/2022 financial year and parliamentary records.
He claims the reports reveal concerns over procurement processes, project supervision, and approvals.
According to the petitioner, stalled infrastructure projects have affected communities through poor road conditions, increased transport costs, and safety concerns.
Petitioner wants investigations and suspension
Makachia is asking the court to suspend Eng. Kinoti from office pending investigations.
He also wants the court to stop further funding to KURA until accountability measures are implemented.
Additionally, he has asked the court to direct relevant agencies, including the Auditor-General, Parliament, and the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC), to investigate the allegations.
The petitioner also wants the recovery of funds allegedly lost through irregular payments.
Case raises governance questions
The petition is based on constitutional provisions covering leadership integrity, access to information, public finance management, and procurement.
Makachia argues that keeping the officials in office while investigations continue could affect transparency and accountability.
The case has attracted attention because of the role of KURA in managing major urban road projects.
Court to determine next steps
The High Court will consider the petitioner’s requests and determine whether interim orders should be issued.
The outcome of the case could influence discussions on accountability and management of public infrastructure funds.
